The Day Pittsfield’s Last Mill Closed

P1020594
The Pontoosuc/Wyandotte Mill in February 2013. Courtesy of John Dickson.

By John Dickson, M.A. student, Department of History

Fifty years later, too late for any hope of employment. The New York Times article on September 19, 2013 reporting the return of textile companies to the U.S. was one month shy of the 50-year anniversary of the culmination of the long, slow decline of textiles manufacturing, at least for one city in western Massachusetts. On October 26, 1963, the small workforce at Wyandotte Mill walked and drove across the bridges over the uppermost reaches of the Housatonic River which had once powered its predecessor, Pontoosuc Woolen Mill. The closing announcement did not make it onto the front page of any newspaper, but it should have. This was the longest continuous running woolen mill operation in a city which had once boasted 11 textile mills, leading the county which produced more wool than any other in the country. It was not quite 140 years since that original mill had been built, on the site of an old saw mill.

In many ways, the story of Pontoosuc Woolen Mill tells the story of the region. It was the brainchild of Henry Shaw, the county representative in the U.S. Congress who hailed from Lanesborough. In politics that sounds more like TV’s House of Cards, Shaw helped Henry Clay pass the tariff of 1824, which placed large taxes on imported wool from England, thereby opening up a market for domestic wool. Shaw moved quickly on such an opportunity and brought together a group of investors to finance the purchase of the property and the construction of the original mill building, which still stands today.

Pontoosuc was not the first mill in the county, but the saw mill it was built on housed in its attic the workshop of Arthur Schofield, a recent immigrant from England who snuck out of his home country with models of — and experience in — the new machinery of spinning wool. The English were desperate to prevent the loss of this know-how and hold on to their manufacturing advantage, but had already lost cotton processing technology through another emigrant, Samuel Slater, who helped build the first American mills in Rhode Island and Massachusetts.

Schofield, who left England in 1793, moved north along the Housatonic, through Connecticut, and ended up in Pittsfield in 1800. Here, he built the first machine to card wool, a process of cleaning and preparing the cut wool. Since his machinery could complete the process several times faster than hand carding, he initially had a small operation to sell the cleaned wool to private individuals, spinning and weaving out of their homes. Schofield then left woolen manufacturing and set up a small operation to build the machines to process wool, selling his equipment around the region. His special tooth-cutting machine was installed in the attic of Keeler’s saw mill at the southern tip of Pontoosuc Lake.

Schofield’s inventions and the new protective tariff combined with the introduction of a new brand of sheep from Spain — merino — and the beginnings of an immigrant work force to bring all the variables together for the flourishing of industry which saw Pittsfield start the transition from an agricultural society to a center of manufacturing. Pontoosuc Woolen Mill initially employed 100 workers, a little less than half of whom were women and children. By mid-century, the mill had built a store, homes, townhouses and boarding houses for a growing workforce which would reach 500 employees by the 20th century.

The list of owners and managers over the course of the 19th century reads like a Who’s Who of Pittsfield. Besides Shaw, whose son took the pen name of Josh Billings and eschewed the wool business for humor, names like Clapp and Kellogg, Campbell, Frances and Plunkett still grace the city’s streets, parks and schools. These individuals helped move the city forward on a path of progress which included setting up the first fire fighting company (owing to the risk of fire in the mills), and the first trolley (which ran from the city center to, you guessed it, Pontoosuc Lake). Pittsfield’s first telephone call was placed at Pontoosuc Woolen Mill, to a bank on North Street.

The mill filled the huge demand for kilt-like balmoral skirts and carriage blankets. When cotton became scarce during the Civil War, the demand for woolen textiles increased, creating enough demand for yet another woolen mill which opened in Pittsfield in 1863. Following the war, cotton production returned and the first mills in the city began to close. Pontoosuc Woolen Mill was able to keep open into the 20th century with lucrative government contracts, including the manufacture of military blankets during the First World War. A Maine firm bought the mill in 1928, just after its centennial, changing the name to Wyandotte Mill.

The Depression hit the wool industry hard with the closing of 4 rival mills in the 1930s. Gradually, new competition from overseas caused production to start shifting south to reduce costs of labor. By the time of the second war, 100 percent cotton and wool textiles were replaced by synthetic fibers, further reducing demand. By the 1950s, just three mills in Pittsfield were still open. Wyandotte managed to stay afloat through production of woolen cloth which was distributed around the world as raw material for other factories to produce the finished products of clothing and blankets.

Organized labor had come to Wyandotte shortly after its purchase of the mill. In 1934, Wyandotte Pittsfield workers joined a month-long textile strike in 20 states. Additional actions took place following the Depression and World War II when Wyandotte workers at all three of their mills struck in 1951 over the failure to make a pay raise retroactive. It was about that time that Wyandotte entered a formal contract with the Textile Union Workers of America, a contract which included a provision for equal pay for equal women’s work. A general strike took place at Wyandotte in 1954, but the weakness of unions in mid-century America can be seen in the rehiring of only 50 of the 475 workers previously employed at the mill. In 1962, workers through the TWUA had signed a new contract with a wage increase, only to find themselves out of work when the mill closed in August 1963.

Fifty years on, news of textile companies returning to the U.S. made it into the New York Times and was reprinted in the local paper, the Berkshire Eagle. Even if there were trained textile workers in this region to have their hopes raised by this news, it seems the new plants will be more interested in hiring computer operators. These returning plants will be staffed with robots to make their cloth.

Relevant Links:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/20/business/us-textile-factories-return.html?_r=0

http://www.berkshireeagle.com/opinion/ci_24299516/milton-bass-made-america-again

http://pittsfieldgazette.com/wyandotte-solution-advances-p973-95.htm

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: